home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 forward

Fromthe Desk of(Continued from page 2)

IMAGE 02_0254.gif
IMAGE 02_0258.gif
IMAGE 02_0255.gif
IMAGE 02_0256.gif
IMAGE 02_0259.gif

Region 3
Nashville
Raleigh
Region 4
Orange County
Portland
Region 5
Central Texas
Dallas/Ft.Worth
Houston
Minnesota
gion)

11.84%
10.11%

IMAGE 02_0257.gif

NY

11.11%
20.00%
16.07%
13.46%
11.70%

Connecticut
OttawaRegion
Quebec
Richmond
Region 2
Central Ohio
Southwestern Ohio

28.00%
10.00%

17.74%
11.65%
10.24%
10.91%

11.49%
10.98%

Region Winners (two per re
(Winning chapters receiveon

e

complimentary 2002 Con-

ventionregistration)
Region 1
Boston(over100)7.46%
Connecticut (lessthan 100)20.00%
Region 2
Eastern Michigan (over 100)7.60%
Central Ohio(lessthan 100)11.49%
Region 3
Central Florida (over 100)9.82%
Nashville(lessthan 100)11.84%
Region 4
Portland(over100)10.00%
OrangeCounty (less than100) 28.00%
Region 5
Dallas/Ft. Worth (Over100)11.65%
Central Texas (less than100)17.74%

IMAGE 02_0260.gif

Board of Directors would like to have the
the ASPE/
Plumbing Engineer Magazine
after 29 years be as amicable as possible. The

relationship
Board has g

iven

every opportunity forPlumbing Engineer
come a true partner with ASPE. It was

Magazinetobe
madecleartothe

Boardthatsuchapartnershipwould

neverhappen.
Wetrulyhopethat
Plumbing EngineerMagazine
continuestobesuccessful.NeithertheSocietynorthe
Board wish any ill will towards the magazine, its publisher
orits staff.All weask inreturn isto betreatedequitably
without rancor,recriminations,editorial venomorletters
to the Board threatening lawsuits.

Overall Region Winners(twofromall regions)
(Winningchaptersre ceivethreecomplimentaryroom
nights forthe2002 Convention)
Dallas/Ft. Worth (Over100)11.65%
OrangeCounty (less than100) 28.00%

IMAGE 02_0261.gif
IMAGE 02_0262.gif
IMAGE 02_0253.gif
IMAGE 02_0264.gif
IMAGE 02_0263.gif

ASPEReport

15

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 forward